4.5 Review

Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor agonists: a patent review (2010-2012)

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 817-841

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1517/13543776.2013.783022

关键词

autoimmune diseases; bradycardia; fingolimod; lymphopenia; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonists; selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)-driven signaling regulates fundamental biological functions, including cell proliferation, angiogenesis, endothelial cell chemotaxis, immune cell trafficking and mitogenesis. A large body of research has been focusing on the development of immunosuppressive S1P(1) receptor (S1P(1)-R) agonist molecules. The S1P(1,3) (-) (5)-R pan-agonist fingolimod (FTY720) has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. However, FTY720 is now contraindicated in patients with compromised cardiac function. Although the main adverse effect bradycardia has been linked to the S1P(3)-R activation, cardiovascular liabilities persist with more selective S1P(1)-R agonists that have entered clinical trials. In contrast to the S1P(1)-R, the therapeutic application of the S1P(2) (-) (5)-Rs remains poorly explored. Areas covered: This review provides the patent literature from 2010 to date on S1P-R agonist molecules and their relevant biological properties. Expert opinion: Limited progress has been made on agonists at S1P(4,5)-R sub-types, with some families of S1P(5)-R agonists showing promising results in animal models of age-related cognitive disorders. A discrete number of reviewed molecules are S1P(1)-R agonists with a promising clinical outlook in transplantation, inflammation, cancer and autoimmune settings. Further preclinical and clinical studies will determine whether the new developed S1P(1)-R agonists do indeed improve the safety profile of FTY720.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据