4.2 Review

Advances in pharmacotherapy for opioid-induced constipation - a systematic review

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 515-532

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2015.995625

关键词

constipation; drug; opioid; pharmacotherapy; review

资金

  1. Mundipharma (Napp, Inc.)
  2. Mundipharma
  3. Grunenthal
  4. Pfizer
  5. Roche Pharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is one of the most frequent and burdening adverse events (AE) of opioid therapy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of drugs in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with adult OIC patients. Areas covered: Efficacy assessment focused on objective outcome measures (OOMs): bowel movement (BM) frequency, BM within 4 h and time to first BM. Twenty-one studies examining seven drugs were identified. Methylnaltrexone showed improvements in all three OOMs. RCTs in naloxone and alvimopan tended to be effective for BM frequency measures. Naloxegol (>= 12.5 mg) improved all OOMs. Though effectiveness of lubiprostone was demonstrated for all OOMs, group differences were small to moderate. CB-5945 and prucalopride tended to increase BM frequency, especially for 0.1 mg twice daily and 4 mg daily, respectively. Besides nausea and diarrhea, abdominal pain was the most frequent AE for all drugs (risk ratio, range: 1.52 - 5.06) except for alvimopan. Treatment-related serious AEs were slightly higher for alvimopan (cardiac events) and prucalopride (severe abdominal pain, headache). Pain scores for placebo and intervention groups were similar for all drugs. Expert opinion: Finding a consensus definition and inclusion criteria for OIC plus a rational balance between efficacy and AEs of drugs remain future challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据