4.2 Review

Pharmacoeconomic considerations of treating patients with advanced Parkinson's disease

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 939-958

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2012.677435

关键词

advanced Parkinson's disease; cost; economic evaluation; effectiveness; QALY

资金

  1. Rentschler
  2. Lundbeck
  3. Abbott
  4. Baxter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases. In the later (advanced) stages of PD, the initial treatment of early PD becomes less effective and long-term side effects of dopaminergic treatment become apparent. In advanced PD, motor and non-motor complications occur, which increase treatment costs. Increasing disability and impaired activities of daily living concomitantly raise indirect costs, due to loss in productivity. Hence, the economic burden of advanced PD is substantial for both the society and the patients with their caregivers. Areas covered: A systematic literature search was performed involving the databases NHS CRD (National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination) and PubMed until July 15, 2011. Parkinson [Mesh] and cost were used as search terms in PubMed and only Parkinson in the CRD database. Expert opinion: Economic evaluations are scarce and heterogeneous, and their interpretation may be limited due to methodological shortcomings. Dopamine agonists, COMT and MAO-B inhibitors as well levodopa infusion and deep brain stimulation are reported to be cost-effective in the respective decision frameworks. However, these results are heavily dependent on assumptions of drug costs and effect sizes used in the models. More detailed real-life information from long-term clinical trials is needed to feed the economic models, especially for head-to-head comparisons. To date, no economic evaluation has been undertaken for possible neuroprotective/disease modifying effects, and further research is needed for evaluations of interventions for non-motor symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据