4.5 Review

Non-mammalian animal models of Parkinson's disease for drug discovery

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 165-176

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17460440903527675

关键词

Caenorhabditis elegans; Drosophila; LRRK2; neurodegeneration; parkin; Parkinson's disease; synuclein

资金

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation
  2. Singhealth Foundation
  3. A*STAR Biomedical Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Importance of the field: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disease affecting millions of predominantly elderly individuals worldwide. Despite intensive efforts devoted to drug discovery, the disease remains incurable. Compounding this problem is the current lack of a truly representative mammalian model of PD. However, a number of non-mammalian models of PD have been created in recent years that hold tremendous promise to accelerate our understanding of the disease as well as to transform the drug discovery process. Areas covered in this review. This review provides an overview of the various Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila genetic models of PD that have been generated to date and discusses the utility of these model systems in the identification of molecules of potential therapeutic value for the PD patient. What the reader will gain: Readers will appreciate the strengths (and limitations) of C. elegans and Drosophila in modeling salient features of the disease as well as their usefulness in uncovering novel gene-gene interaction and pathways relevant to PD pathogenesis. Readers will also appreciate how technological advancements have allowed the direct evaluation of novel compounds in these living models of PD in a virtually high-throughput manner. Take home message: Non-mammalian models of PD provide a valuable in vivo platform for drug screening. Unlike cell-based systems, these living models with an intact nervous system allow for a more meaningful evaluation of the neuroprotective properties of genetic and chemical modifiers to be conducted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据