4.0 Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Nb2O5:La3+,Eu3+ Phosphors Obtained by the Non-Hydrolytic Sol-Gel Process

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 2558-2570

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20150242

关键词

non-hydrolytic sol-gel route; niobia; red phosphor; luminescence

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES
  3. FAPESP-CNRS [2011/51858-0]
  4. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
  5. [2011/09823-4]
  6. [2012/11673-3]
  7. [2011/15757-4]
  8. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [12/11673-3, 11/09823-4] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phosphor-converted light-emitting diode technique is an important solid-state illumination strategy. Sulfide-based materials are the most often employed red phosphors, but they are chemically unstable and present lower efficiency in comparison to the blue and green phosphors. Therefore, it is important to find a new red phosphor source that can emit intense red light while absorbing light in the near ultraviolet (UV) spectral region. This paper describes the photoluminescence properties of Nb2O5:La3+,Eu3+ obtained by the non-hydrolytic sol-gel process. The X-ray results indicated that the thermal treatment allowed to obtain the different crystalline structures such as, the orthorhombic and monoclinic phases for the Nb2O5 and the orthorhombic phase for the La2Nb10O28. This polymorphism was also confirmed by the Raman spectroscopy. The luminescence spectra revealed the existence of the Eu3+ ions in both crystalline phases for the samples annealed at higher temperature, depending of the excitation wavelength. The emission spectrum showed that increasing the annealing temperature promotes the narrowing of all intraconfigurational f-f transitions for the Eu3+ ions, due to the structural changes. In addition, all samples present good CIE (International Illumination Committee) chromaticity coordinates when excited in the UV (275 and 394 nm), blue (465 nm) and green (525 nm) radiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据