4.3 Article

Fibroblast growth factor 2-stimulated proliferation is lower in muscle precursor cells from old rats

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 94, 期 6, 页码 739-748

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.046136

关键词

-

资金

  1. DHHS [5T32-AR048523, RO1-AG18780]
  2. University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine
  3. Society of Phi Zeta Research Grant
  4. US Department of Education [H133P050005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In aged skeletal muscle, impairments in regrowth and regeneration may be explained by a decreased responsiveness of muscle precursor cells (MPCs) to environmental cues such as growth factors. We hypothesized that impaired responsiveness to fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) in MPCs from old animals would be explained by impaired FGF2 signalling. We determined that 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and cell number increase less in MPCs from 32- compared with 3-month-old rats. In the presence of FGF2, we demonstrated that there were age-associated differential expression patterns for FGF receptor 1 and 2 mRNAs. Measurement of downstream signalling revealed that that mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2)-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, protein kinase C and p38 were FGF2-driven pathways in MPCs. Uniquely, protein kinase C signalling was shown to play the largest role in FGF2-stimulated proliferation in MPCs. c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signalling was ruled out as an FGF2-stimulated proliferation pathway in MPCs. Inhibition of JNK had no effect on FGF2 signalling to BrdU incorporation, and FGF2 treatment was associated with increased phosphorylation of p38, which inhibits, rather than stimulates, BrdU incorporation in MPCs. Surprisingly, the commonly used vehicle, dimethyl sulphoxide, rescued proliferation in MPCs from old animals. These findings provide insight for the development of effective treatment strategies that target the age-related impairments of MPC proliferation in old skeletal muscle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据