4.7 Article

Activated RHOA and peripheral axon regeneration

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 212, 期 2, 页码 358-369

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.04.023

关键词

nerve regeneration; RHO GTPase; adult sensory neuron; Rho kinase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regeneration of adult Peripheral neurons after transection is slow, incomplete and encumbered by severe barriers to proper regrowth. The role of RHOA GTPase has not been examined in this context. We examined the expression, activity and functional role of RHOA GTPase and its ROK effector, inhibitors of regeneration, during peripheral axon outgrowth. We used qRT-PCR, quantitative immunohistochemistry, and assays of RHOA activation to examine expression in sensory neurons of rats with sciatic transection injuries. In vitro, we exposed dissociated adult sensory neurons, not grown on inhibitory substrates, to a RHOA-ROK inhibitor HA-1077 and measured neurite initiation and outgrowth. In vivo, we exposed early regenerating axons and Schwann cells directly to HA-1077 in a conduit connecting the proximal and distal stumps of transected sciatic nerves. Intact adult dorsal root ganglia sensory neurons expressed RHOA and ROK 1 mRNAs and protein and there were rises in RHOA after injury. Activated GTP-bound RHOA, undetectable in intact ganglia, was dramatically upregulated in both neurons and axons after injury. Adult rat sensory neurons in vitro demonstrated a dose-related increase in the initiation of neurite outgrowth, and in the proportion with long neurites when they were exposed to a ROK antagonist. Regenerative bridges that were directly exposed to the ROK inhibitor had a close-related rise in the extent and distance of in vivo axon and partnered Schwann cell regrowth within them. RHOA activation and signaling are features of adult peripheral axon regeneration within its own milieu, independent of myelin. Inhibition of its activation may benefit peripheral axon lesions. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据