4.5 Article

A Novel Subset Splitting Procedure for Digital Image Correlation on Discontinuous Displacement Fields

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 353-364

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-009-9220-2

关键词

Digital image correlation and subset splitting; Discontinuous displacement fields; Novel DIC technique validation; Experimental fracture mechanics; Crack opening displacement and crack profile

资金

  1. McGill University Faculty of Engineering
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Digital Image Correlation (DIC) is an easy to use yet powerful approach to measure displacement and strain fields. While the method is robust and accurate for a variety of applications, standard DIC returns large error and poor correlation quality near displacement discontinuities such as cracks or shear bands. This occurs because the subsets used for correlation can only capture continuous deformations from the reference to the deformed image. As a result the regions around discontinuities are typically removed from the area of interest, before or after analysis. Here, a novel approach is proposed which enables the subset to split in two sections when a discontinuity is detected. This method enables the measurement of displacement jumps, and also of displacements and strains right by the discontinuity (for example a crack profile or residual strains in the wake). The method is validated on digitally created images based on mode I and mode II asymptotic displacement fields, for both sub-pixel and super-pixel crack opening displacements. Finally, an actual fracture experiment on a high density polyethylene (HDPE) specimen demonstrates the robustness of the method on actual images. Compared to other methods capable of handling discontinuities, this novel subset-splitting procedure offers the advantage of being a direct extension of the now popular standard DIC, and can therefore be implemented as an upgrade to that method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据