4.6 Article

PKCη is a negative regulator of AKT inhibiting the IGF-I induced proliferation

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 318, 期 7, 页码 789-799

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.01.018

关键词

PKC eta; AKT phosphorylation; UV induced apoptosis; IGF-I induced proliferation

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [1413/10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The PI3K-AKT pathway is frequently activated in human cancers, including breast cancer, and its activation appears to be critical for tumor maintenance. Some malignant cells are dependent on activated AKT for their survival; tumors exhibiting elevated AKT activity show sensitivity to its inhibition, providing an Achilles heel for their treatment. Here we show that the PKC eta isoform is a negative regulator of the AKT signaling pathway. The IGF-I induced phosphorylation on Ser473 of AKT was inhibited by the PKC eta-induced expression in MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cancer cells. This was further confirmed in shRNA PKC eta-knocked-down MCF-7 cells, demonstrating elevated phosphorylation on ART Ser473. While PKC eta exhibited negative regulation on AKT phosphorylation it did not alter the IGF-I induced ERR phosphorylation. However, it enhanced ERK phosphorylation when stimulated by PDGF. Moreover, its effects on IGF-I/AKT and PDGF/ERK pathways were in correlation with cell proliferation. We further show that both PKC eta and IGF-I confer protection against UV-induced apoptosis and cell death having additive effects. Although the protective effect of IGF-I involved activation of AKT, it was not affected by PKC eta expression, suggesting that PKC eta acts through a different route to increase cell survival. Hence, our studies show that PKC eta provides negative control on AKT pathway leading to reduced cell proliferation, and further suggest that its presence/absence in breast cancer cells will affect cell death, which could be of therapeutic value. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据