4.6 Article

Rosiglitazone induces autophagy in H295R and cell cycle deregulation in SW13 adrenocortical cancer cells

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 317, 期 10, 页码 1397-1410

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.02.014

关键词

Thiazolidinediones; Autophagy; Cell cycle; Adrenocortical carcinoma

资金

  1. 'Sapienza' Universita di Roma [8.1.1.1.2.16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thiazolidinediones, specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) ligands, used in type-2 diabetes therapy, show favourable effects in several cancer cells. In this study we demonstrate that the growth of H295R and SW13 adrenocortical cancer cells is inhibited by rosiglitazone, a thiazolidinediones member, even though the mechanisms underlying this effect appeared to be cell-specific. Treatment with GW9662, a selective PPAR-gamma-inhibitor, showed that rosiglitazone acts through both PPAR-gamma-dependent and -independent mechanisms in H295R, while in SW13 cells the effect seems to be independent of PPAR-gamma. H295R cells treated with rosiglitazone undergo an autophagic process, leading to morphological changes detectable by electron microscopy and an increased expression of specific proteins such as AMPK alpha and beclin-1. The autophagy seems to be independent of PPAR-gamma activation and could be related to an increase in oxidative stress mediated by reactive oxygen species production with the disruption of the mitochondrial membrane potential, triggered by rosiglitazone. In SW13 cells, flow cytometry analysis showed an arrest in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle with a decrease of cyclin E and cdk2 activity, following the administration of rosiglitazone. Our data show the potential role of rosiglitazone in the therapeutic approach to adrenocortical carcinoma and indicate the molecular mechanisms at the base of its antiproliferative effects, which appear to be manifold and cell-specific in adrenocortical cancer lines.(C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据