4.6 Article

Genomic response to Wnt signalling is highly context-dependent - Evidence from DNA microarray and chromatin immunoprecipitation screens of Wnt/TCF targets

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 315, 期 16, 页码 2690-2704

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.06.021

关键词

Writ signaling; TCF; Chromatin immunoprecipitation; Central nervous system

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [107406, 206038]
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. European Union [LSHG-CT-2004-005085]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [107406, 107406] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Writ proteins are important regulators of embryonic development, and dysregulated Writ signalling is involved in the oncogenesis of several human cancers. Our knowledge of the downstream target genes is limited, however. We used a chromatin immunoprecipitation-based assay to isolate and characterize the actual gene segments through which Writ-activatable transcription factors, TCFs, regulate transcription and an Affymetrix microarray analysis to study the global transcriptional response to the Wnt3a ligand. The anti-beta-catenin immunoprecipitation of DNA-protein complexes from mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts expressing a fusion Protein of beta-catenin and TCF7 resulted in the identification of 92 genes as Putative TCF targets. GeneChip assays of gene expression performed on NIH3T3 cells and the rat pheochromocytoma cell line PC12 revealed 355 genes in NIH3T3 and 129 genes in the PC12 cells with marked changes in expression after Wnt3a stimulus. Only 2 Wnt-regulated genes were shared by both cell lines. Surprisingly, Disabled-2 was the only gene identified by the chromatin immunoprecipitation approach that displayed a marked change in expression in the GeneChip assay. Taken together, our, approaches give an insight into the complex context-dependent nature of Writ pathway transcriptional responses and identify Disabled-2 as a potential new direct target for Writ signalling. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据