4.4 Article

Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 is overexpressed and contributes to epigenetic inactivation if p21 and phosphatase and tensin homolog in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 237, 期 9, 页码 1110-1116

出版社

ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2012.012075

关键词

EZH2; B-ALL; epigenitic silencing; p21; PTEN; deazaneplanocin A

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30830052, 30911130363]
  2. National Key Scientific Program of China [2011CB964901]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University-PCSIRT [IRT0909]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is crucially involved in epigenetic silencing by acting as a histone methyltransferase. Although EZH2 is overexpressed in many solid cancers, the role of EZH2 in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) remains largely unexplored. In a microarray experiment, we found that EZH2 was significantly upregulated in Nalm-6 cells and this was associated with the silencing of tumor suppressor genes p21, p53 and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). The abnormal expression of these genes was further confirmed by quantitative realtime polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis on Nalm-6 cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay showed that EZH2 and H3K27me3 were both enriched in the promoter region of PTEN and p21 in Nalm-6 cells but not in normal B cells. Functional analysis showed that siRNA-mediated EZH2 knockdown led to decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis of Nalm-6 cells, accompanied by the reactivation of PTEN and p21 expression. Furthermore, we found that EZH2 inhibitor deazaneplanocin A promoted vincristine sulfate-induced apoptosis of Nalm-6 cells. Taken together, our data suggest that EZH2 is overexpressed in B-ALL and promotes the progression of B-ALL by directly mediating the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes p21 and PTEN, and could serve as a potential epigenetic target for B-ALL therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据