4.3 Article

Ecological and genetic assessment of spatial structure among replicate contact zones between two topminnow species

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 1145-1161

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-011-9461-2

关键词

Coexistence; Hybridization; Ecological gradient; Mosaic; Fundulus

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [0716985]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [749755] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0716985] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spatial structure of contact zones is often described as disjunct, diffuse or mosaic and presumed to be related to underlying ecological gradients. However, the ecology of contact zones, how they are structured, and if that structure is predictable based on the strength and nature of ecological gradients is unknown. Large spatial scales and the unreplicated nature of many of the best studied contact zones has made it difficult to codify broader ecological patterns. Freshwater stream fish contact zones have the advantage of being potentially replicated with well defined boundaries and predictable linear gradients (river continuum concept). We sampled four replicate topminnow (Fundulus olivaceus and F. notatus) contact zones in Gulf of Mexico drainages. In each, we quantified contact zone spatial structure and the strength of ecological gradients (habitat, physicochemical variables and fish community functional traits). All three types of contact zone structure were represented. Systems with weaker gradients had diffuse contact zones, low species richness and were numerically dominated by generalist species. Rates of hybridization were also variable among systems. There was no hybridization detected in the mosaic zone while hybrids were found at most of the co-occurrence sites in the diffuse and disjunct zones. Overall, local ecology clearly influences contact zone structure and the two species interact in fundamentally different ways in these four systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据