4.2 Review

Evolutionary Novelty and the Evo-Devo Synthesis: Field Notes

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 2-3, 页码 93-99

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-010-9083-6

关键词

Evolutionary developmental biology; Interdisciplinarity; Evolutionary novelty; Evolutionary innovation; Concepts

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [410-2008-0400]
  2. McKnight Land-Grant Professorship at the University of Minnesota

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accounting for the evolutionary origins of morphological novelty is one of the core challenges of contemporary evolutionary biology. A successful explanatory framework requires the integration of different biological disciplines, but the relationships between developmental biology and standard evolutionary biology remain contested. There is also disagreement about how to define the concept of evolutionary novelty. These issues were the subjects of a workshop held in November 2009 at the University of Alberta. We report on the discussion and results of this workshop, addressing questions about (i) how to define evolutionary novelty and understand its significance, (ii) how to interpret evolutionary developmental biology as a synthesis and its relation to neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory, and (iii) how to integrate disparate biological approaches in general.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Evolutionary Biology

Historical and philosophical perspectives on the study of developmental bias

Ingo Brigandt

EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT (2020)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Character identity mechanisms: a conceptual model for comparative-mechanistic biology

James DiFrisco, Alan C. Love, Gunter P. Wagner

BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY (2020)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

Positional Information and the Measurement of Specificity

Alan C. Love

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2020)

Article History & Philosophy Of Science

The living fossil concept: reply to Turner

Scott Lidgard, Alan C. Love

Summary: Researchers suggested rethinking the function of the living fossil concept, arguing that concepts in science have useful roles beyond just categorization. They discussed the diverse and sometimes conflicting criteria associated with categorizing items as living fossils and how these criteria are closely related to answering questions about prolonged evolutionary stasis.

BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY (2021)

Editorial Material Biology

Organizing Interdisciplinary Research on Purpose

Alan C. Love, Max Dresow

BIOSCIENCE (2022)

Article Ecology

Co-option of stress mechanisms in the origin of evolutionary novelties

Alan Love, Gunter P. Wagner

Summary: It is widely accepted that stressful conditions can facilitate evolutionary change by increasing heritable variation and promoting rapid adaptive evolution. Stressors can be categorized into two types based on their effect on functional integrity: stress-responsive mechanisms that maintain adaptive fit with the environment, and stress-responsive mechanisms specific to stressors that lead to the emergence of novelties through compensation. Our model explains the evolutionary transformation of an immediate response to acute stress into routine protection from recurring stressors by considering cost-benefit trade-offs. Examples from different levels of organization support the general principle of evolutionary origination based on the ability to switch between regulatory states related to reproduction and survival.

EVOLUTION (2022)

Review Biodiversity Conservation

Evolvability in the fossil record

Alan C. Love, Mark Grabowski, David Houle, Lee Hsiang Liow, Arthur Porto, Masahito Tsuboi, Kjetil L. Voje, Gene Hunt

Summary: This paper discusses the importance of evolvability in evolutionary biology and its application in paleontology. Despite challenges in applying tools from evolvability literature to the fossil record, the fossil record provides unique data sources that capture evolutionary patterns and assist evolutionary biologists in their research. Additionally, combining neontological and paleontological approaches is an important direction for future studies.

PALEOBIOLOGY (2022)

Article Anatomy & Morphology

The hierarchical basis of serial homology and evolutionary novelty

James DiFrisco, Alan C. Love, Gunter P. Wagner

Summary: This article discusses the pervasiveness of gene sharing in evolution and the issue of homology across different lineages. The authors propose a new theoretical classification to address the problem of determining homology. They argue that the concept of serial homology should primarily be applied to developmentally individualized body parts and suggest a hierarchical, phylogenetic interpretation.

JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY (2023)

Book Review History & Philosophy Of Science

Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences MIT

Ingo Brigandt

JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2023)

Article Anatomy & Morphology

Against unifying homology concepts: Redirecting the debate

Devin Y. Gouvea, Ingo Brigandt

Summary: The term homology has different definitions in different fields, and there are two main approaches to unify these definitions: preserving the distinguishing features related to specific research goals or seeking conceptual unification by integrating various definitions. This paper proposes an alternative strategy based on scientific concepts as research tools and illustrates its effectiveness through two case studies.

JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY (2023)

Letter Ecology

Stress, harshness, and evolutionary history

Alan C. Love, Gunter P. Wagner

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION (2023)

Article Philosophy

Engaging with Science, Values, and Society: Introduction

Ingo Brigandt

Summary: Philosophical work on science and values has increasingly focused on the concerns of society and stakeholders affected by science and policy, leading to the development of socially relevant and socially engaged philosophy of science. This special issue showcases instances of socially relevant philosophy of science.

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2022)

Article Philosophy

How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking about Natural Kinds

Ingo Brigandt

Summary: Recent attempts to develop a general theory of the properties that all natural kinds possess may have been futile, and instead, a general methodological framework for studying kinds from a philosophical perspective should be developed. This framework should consider human aims and non-epistemic goals. Furthermore, it is important to stop using the term "natural kinds" as it obscures the significance of human interests and the social processes that underlie many kinds.

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY (2022)

Article Behavioral Sciences

Free Will, Determinism, and Intuitive Judgments About the Heritability of Behavior

Emily A. Willoughby, Alan C. Love, Matt McGue, William G. Iacono, Jack Quigley, James J. Lee

BEHAVIOR GENETICS (2019)

暂无数据