4.3 Article

Identification of New Aquaporin Genes and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in Bread Wheat

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY BIOINFORMATICS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 437-452

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.4137/EBO.S12568

关键词

major intrinsic proteins; aquaporins; gene expression; abiotic stress; homology modeling

资金

  1. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) [DWR/RP/2010-5.3]
  2. Agri-Bioinformatics Promotion Program of Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Major facilitators of water movement through plant cell membranes include aquaporin proteins. Wheat is among the largest and most important cereal crops worldwide; however, unlike other model plants such as rice, maize and Arabidopsis, little has been reported on wheat major intrinsic proteins (MIPs). This study presents a comprehensive computational identification of 349 new wheat expressed sequence tags (ESTs), encoding 13 wheat aquaporin genes. Identified aquaporins consist of 6 plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIP) and 1 TIP showing high sequence similarity with rice aquaporins. We also identified 4 NOD26-like intrinsic proteins (NIP) and 2 SIP members that showed more divergence. Further, expression analysis of the aquaporin genes using the available EST information in UniGene revealed their transcripts were differentially regulated in various stress-and tissue-specific libraries. Allele specific Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) were designed using PIP as the target gene and validated on a core set of Indian wheat genotypes. A 3D theoretical model of the wheat aquaporin protein was built by homology modeling and could prove to be useful in the further functional characterization of this protein. Collectively with expression and bioinformatics analysis, our results support the idea that the genes identified in this study signify an important genetic resource providing potential targets to modify the water use properties of wheat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据