4.6 Article

Temporal patterns of genetic variation in a salmon population undergoing rapid change in migration timing

期刊

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 795-807

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12066

关键词

climate change; genetic change; genetic divergence; genetic diversity; genetic effective population size; phenology; salmon

资金

  1. Alaska EPSCoR Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. Institute of Arctic Biology Summer Research Fellowship
  3. North Pacific Research Board [1110, 415]
  4. Alaska Sustainable Salmon Fund [45965]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Though genetic diversity is necessary for population persistence in rapidly changing environments, little is known about how climate-warming influences patterns of intra-population genetic variation. For a pink salmon population experiencing increasing temperatures, we used temporal genetic data (microsatellite=1993, 2001, 2009; allozyme=1979, 1981, 1983) to quantify the genetic effective population size (N-e) and genetic divergence due to differences in migration timing and to estimate whether these quantities have changed over time. We predicted that temporal trends toward earlier migration timing and a corresponding loss of phenotypic variation would decrease genetic divergence based on migration timing and N-e. We observed significant genetic divergence based on migration timing and genetic heterogeneity between early- and late-migrating fish. There was also some evidence for divergent selection between early- and late-migrating fish at circadian rhythm genes, but results varied over time. Estimates of N-e from multiple methods were large (>1200) and N-e/N-c generally exceeded 0.2. Despite shifts in migration timing and loss of phenotypic variation, there was no evidence for changes in within-population genetic divergence or N-e over the course of this study. These results suggest that in instances of population stability, genetic diversity may be resistant to climate-induced changes in migration timing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据