4.5 Article

THE PRECOPULATORY FUNCTION OF MALE GENITAL SPINES IN DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE[DOLESCHALL] (DIPTERA: DROSOPHILIDAE) REVEALED BY LASER SURGERY

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 66, 期 8, 页码 2637-2645

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01638.x

关键词

Adaptive function; animal genitalia; copulation success; functional morphology; laser ablation; sexual selection

资金

  1. University Research Council (URC)
  2. McMicken College of Arts and Sciences and the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Cincinnati
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB-1118599]
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1118599] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

That male genital morphology evolves via postcopulatory sexual selection is a widely held view. In contrast, the precopulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution has received less attention. Here, we test the hypothesis that male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae promote competitive male copulation success. Using laser surgery to manipulate trait size, we demonstrate that incremental reductions of spine length progressively reduce male copulation success: males without spines failed entirely to copulate because of an inability to couple the genitalia together, whereas males with halfway ablated and blunted spines suffered reductions in copulation success of 87% and 13%, respectively. The decrease in copulation success resulting from spine length reduction was markedly stronger in sexually competitive environments than in noncompetitive environments, and females expressed resistance behaviors similarly toward competing male treatments, demonstrating directly the role of genital spines in promoting competitive copulation success. Because these spines are widespread within Drosophila, and because genital traits with precopulatory function are being discovered in a growing number of animal taxa, precopulatory sexual selection may have a more pervasive role in genital evolution than previously recognized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据