4.5 Article

MIGRATION RATES, FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION AND THE SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY LOCUS IN LEAVENWORTHIA (BRASSICACEAE)

期刊

EVOLUTION
卷 65, 期 8, 页码 2357-2369

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01300.x

关键词

Balancing selection; divergence time estimates; gene flow; self-incompatibility locus

资金

  1. Tomlinson Fellowship
  2. NSERC
  3. NSERC CANPOLIN Strategic Networks
  4. Canadian Foundation for Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loci subject to negative frequency-dependent selection are expected to exhibit higher effective migration rates compared to reference loci. Although the number of gene copies transferred between populations by migration is the same for all genes, those subject to negative frequency-dependent selection are more likely to be retained in the immigrant population because rare alleles are selectively favored. So far, evidence for this prediction has been indirect, based on summary statistics rather than on migration rate estimates. Here, we introduce an approximate Bayesian procedure to jointly estimate migration rates at two predefined sets of loci between two populations. We applied the procedure to compare migration rate estimates at the self-incompatibility locus (S-locus) with that at 10 reference loci in two plant species, Leavenworthia alabamica and L. crassa (Brassicaceae). The maximum likelihood estimate for the proportion of migrants (m) was four times higher at the S-locus than at reference loci, but the difference was not statistically significant. Lack of significance might be due to insufficient data, but perhaps also to the recent divergence of the two species (311 ka), because we also show using simulations that the effective migration rate at the S-locus is expected to increase with increasing divergence time. These findings aid in understanding the evolutionary dynamics of negative frequency-dependent selection and they suggest that divergence time should be accounted for when employing migration rates to help detect negative frequency-dependent selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据