3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Recent developments in research on kidney cancer: Highlights from urological and oncological congresses in 2007

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 494-507

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eursup.2008.01.001

关键词

angiogenesis inhibitors; bevacizumab; partial nephrectomy; radical nephrectomy; renal cell cancer; sorafenib; sunitinib; temsirolimus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: This paper communicates the major new findings on renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that were presented at the 2007 annual meetings of the European Association of Urology (EAU), American Urological Association (AUA) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and discussed during a closed meeting in September 2007. Methods: The most relevant new findings were selected by urological experts in the field of RCC. Results: Although laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a promising technique, it may be associated with additional postoperative morbidity and prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) compared with open PN. WIT is the strongest modifiable risk factor to avoid decreased renal function after PN. LPN is not recommended in patients with a unique/solitary kidney. However, PN should be preferred to radical nephrectomy whenever PN is technically feasible, because data suggest that overall survival is decreased in patients with small renal turnours who underwent a radical nephrectomy. Conclusions: Additional data have been accumulated regarding targeted therapies. The efficacy of sunitinib and sorafenib as first- and second-line therapy, respectively, has been confirmed. Prognostic factors have been identified for both therapies., Although, sorafenib was not superior to interferon-alpha as first-line treatment, dose escalation with sorafenib could be an interesting approach. Bevacizumab improves progression-free survival when combined with interferon-alpha as first-line therapy. New drugs as well as drug combinations are now being investigated. (C) 2008 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据