3.9 Article

A comparative study of thermal aging of transformer insulation paper impregnated in natural ester and in mineral oil

期刊

EUROPEAN TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL POWER
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 518-533

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etep.336

关键词

transformer; insulation; aging; paper; oil; natural ester

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50677073]
  2. Scientific Funds fc Outstanding Young Scientists of China [50425722]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging of two kinds of transformer insulation paper in natural ester is compared to that in conventional transformer oil (mineral oil). Sealed aging vessels containing copper, insulation paper (Kraft paper and thermally upgraded paper), and dielectric fluid (mineral oil and natural ester) wen aged at 90, 110, and 130 degrees C for 399, 371, and 329 days. Under the same aging condition, both the degree of polymerization (DP) and the leveling-of degree of polymerization (LODP) for natural ester aged paper were higher than the ones for mineral oil aged paper, and the micro surface of natura ester aged paper was destroyed less seriously than that of the mineral oil aged paper. The aging time to reach LODP for natural ester aged paper was. only 1/4 to 2/3 of that for mineral oil aged paper. When water content in natural ester for natural ester aged Kraft paper samples reached the maximum, acids concentration in natural ester increased abruptly. Water content in natural ester decreased in the whole aging process for natura ester aged thermally upgraded paper samples. Six physical and chemical mechanisms for the slower aging rate of natural ester aged paper art proposed. Evidence for transesterification between natural ester and paper was presented with infrared spectra instrument. Although the acids it natural ester were far more than in mineral oil, the natural ester can significantly slow the thermal aging of the paper. Three mechanisms of thi abnormal phenomenon were presented. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据