4.6 Article

Airway epithelial cell apoptosis and inflammation in COPD, smokers and nonsmokers

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 1058-1067

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00063112

关键词

Airway inflammation; cigarette smoking; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; epithelial cell biology; infections in COPD; smoking and health

资金

  1. Public Health Agency [EAT/3978/08] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We hypothesised that primary bronchial epithelial cells (PBECs) from subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) respond differently to Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide (LPS) after cigarette smoke extract (CSE) exposure than PBECs obtained from smokers without airflow obstruction and nonsmokers. PBECs from 16 COPD subjects, 10 smokers without airflow obstruction and nine nonsmokers were cultured at air-liquid interface. Cultures were incubated with CSE prior to stimulation with P. aeruginosa LPS. Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 were measured by ELISA and Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 expression by fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Activation of nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B was determined by Western blotting and ELISA, and MAPK and caspase-3 activity by Western blotting. Apoptosis was evaluated using Annexin-V staining and the terminal transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labelling methods. Constitutive release of IL-8 and IL-6 was greatest from the COPD cultures. However, CSE pretreatment followed by P. aeruginosa LPS stimulation reduced IL-8 release from COPD PBECs, but increased it from cells of smokers without airflow obstruction and nonsmokers. TLR-4 expression, MAPK and NF-kappa B activation in COPD cultures were reduced after CSE treatment, but not in the smokers without airflow obstruction or nonsmoker groups, which was associated with increased apoptosis. CSE attenuates inflammatory responses to LPS in cells from people with COPD but not those from nonsmoking individuals and those who smoke without airflow obstruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据