4.6 Article

What does adolescent undiagnosed wheeze represent? Findings from the Isle of Wight Cohort

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 580-588

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00085111

关键词

Asthma; lung function; paracetamol; smoking; undiagnosed wheeze; wheezing phenotype

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health USA [5 R01 HL082925]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We sought to characterise adolescent wheeze in the absence of asthma, which we termed undiagnosed wheeze. The Isle of Wight Birth Cohort (n=1,456) was reviewed at 1, 2, 4, 10 and 18 yrs. Using questionnaire responses, asthma was defined as ever had asthma plus either wheezing in the last 12 months or taking asthma treatment in the last 12 months; undiagnosed wheeze as wheeze in the last 12 months but no to ever had asthma; and remaining subjects termed non-wheezers. Undiagnosed wheeze (prevalence 4.9%) accounted for 22% of wheezing at 18 yrs. This was largely adolescent-onset with similar symptom frequency and severity to diagnosed asthma. However, undiagnosed wheezers had significantly higher forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio, less bronchodilator reversibility and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and were less frequently atopic than asthmatics. Undiagnosed wheezers had earlier smoking onset, higher smoking rates and monthly paracetamol use than non-wheezers. Logistic regression identified paracetamol use (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23; p=0.03), smoking at 18 yrs (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.19-5.41; p=0.02), rhinitis at 18 yrs (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.38-5.73; p=0.004) and asthmatic family history (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.10-4.63; p=0.03) as significant independent risk factors for undiagnosed wheeze. Undiagnosed wheeze is relatively common during adolescence, differs from diagnosed asthma and has strong associations with smoking and paracetamol use. Better recognition of undiagnosed wheeze and assessment of potential relevance to adult health is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据