4.6 Article

24-h duration of the novel LABA vilanterol trifenatate in asthma patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 570-579

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00121411

关键词

Add-on therapy; asthma management; bronchodilator

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline [B2C109575]
  2. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0510-10249] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current guidelines recommend adding a long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonist (LABA) to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with uncontrolled asthma. This study evaluated the novel, once-daily LABA vilanterol trifenatate (VI) in asthma patients who remained symptomatic despite existing ICS therapy. The study involved a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of VI (3, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 mu g), administered once daily in the evening by dry powder inhaler for 28 days, in asthma patients aged >= 12 yrs symptomatic on current ICS therapy. The primary end-point was trough (24 h post-dose) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1); secondary end-points were weighted mean FEV1, peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom-/rescue-free 24-h periods, and safety. A significant relationship was observed between VI dose and improvements in trough FEV1 (p=0.037). Statistically significant increases in mean trough FEV1, relative to placebo, were documented for VI 12.5-50 mu g (121-162 mL; p <= 0.016). Dose-related effects of VI were observed on weighted mean (0-24 h) FEV1, morning/evening PEF, and symptom-/rescue-free 24-h periods. All doses of VI were well tolerated with low incidences of recognised LABA-related adverse events (tremor 0-2%; palpitations 0-2%; glucose effects 0-1%; potassium effects 0-<1%). Once-daily VI 12.5-50 mu g resulted in prolonged bronchodilation of at least 24 h with good tolerability in asthma patients receiving ICS. Based on the overall efficacy and adverse event profile from this study, the optimum dose of VI appears to be 25 mg.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据