4.6 Article

Second-hand smoke exposure in a sample of European hospitals

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 111-116

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00180708

关键词

Environmental tobacco smoke; Europe; hospitals; particles with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mu m; second-hand smoke; tobacco smoke pollution

资金

  1. European Commission [2005329]
  2. Ministry of Health [RD06/0020/0089]
  3. Ministries of Science and Universities [SGR200500646]
  4. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red en Epidemiologia y Salud Publica [CB06/02/0032]
  5. French government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smoking in hospitals is banned in many European countries; nevertheless, the level of compliance is diverse, and, in some cases, smoking areas remain. The present study describes the levels of second-hand smoke, as derived from respirable suspended particle measurements, in a sample of European hospitals during the year 2007. The present study was a multicentric descriptive cross-sectional study carried out in 30 hospitals in seven European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Romania and Spain). Particulate matter with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) concentration was measured by means of a hand-held laser-operated monitor of particle size and mass concentration in six selected indoor locations. Medians and interquartile ranges of PM2.5 concentration were computed in order to describe the data by country and location of measurement. The median PM2.5 concentration in all countries and locations was 3.0 mu g.m(-3), with half of the measurements ranging 2.0-7.0 mu g.m(-3). PM2.5 levels were similar across countries. Eleven (5.5%) measurements were >25.0 mu g.m(-3), which is the 24-h mean limit recommended by the World Health Organization outdoor air quality guideline. The present results show that exposure to second-hand smoke in this sample of European hospitals is very low, and can be easily monitored in order to ensure smoke-free legislation compliance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据