4.7 Article

Early diffuse recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: analysis of risk factors

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 190-197

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2561-8

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinomas; Radiofrequency catheter ablation; Percutaneous catheter ablation; Recurrence; Risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the risk factors affecting early diffuse recurrence within 1 year of percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Out of 146 patients who received transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) for treatment of recurrent HCC after percutaneous ultrasound-guided RFA, we selected 23 patients with early diffuse recurrence. Early diffuse recurrence was defined as three or more new recurrent HCCs within 1 year of initial RFA. As a control group, we selected 23 patients, matched exactly for age and sex, in which there was no local tumour progression or new recurrence after RFA. To analyse the risk factors, we examined patient factors and tumour factors. Recurrent tumours occurred from 30 to 365 days after RFA (median time, 203 days). Univariate analysis indicated that larger tumour size and poorly defined margin were significant risk factors (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that poorly defined margin was a significant risk factor (P < 0.05). Larger tumour size and poorly defined margin may be risk factors for early diffuse recurrence of HCC within 1 year of RFA. Tumours with such risk factors should be treated with a combination of TACE to minimise the potential for therapeutic failure. aEuro cent Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is widely used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). aEuro cent Early diffuse recurrence after RFA is an important prognostic factor aEuro cent The risk factors for recurrence are larger tumour size and poorly defined margins aEuro cent Tumours with such risk factors should be treated with transarterial chemoembolisation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据