4.2 Article

Statistical mechanics of two-dimensional Euler flows and minimum enstrophy states

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 187-212

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2010-00269-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simplified thermodynamic approach of the incompressible 2D Euler equation is considered based on the conservation of energy, circulation and microscopic enstrophy. Statistical equilibrium states are obtained by maximizing the Miller-Robert-Sommeria (MRS) entropy under these sole constraints. We assume that these constraints are selected by properties of forcing and dissipation. We find that the vorticity fluctuations are Gaussian while the mean flow is characterized by a linear (w) over bar - psi relationship. Furthermore, we prove that the maximization of entropy at fixed energy, circulation and microscopic enstrophy is equivalent to the minimization of macroscopic enstrophy at fixed energy and circulation. This provides a justification of the minimum enstrophy principle from statistical mechanics when only the microscopic enstrophy is conserved among the infinite class of Casimir constraints. Relaxation equations towards the statistical equilibrium state are derived. These equations can serve as numerical algorithms to determine maximum entropy or minimum enstrophy states. We use these relaxation equations to study geometry induced phase transitions in rectangular domains. In particular, we illustrate with the relaxation equations the transition between monopoles and dipoles predicted by Chavanis and Sommeria [J. Fluid Mech. 314, 267 (1996)]. We take into account stable as well as metastable states and show that metastable states are robust and have negative specific heats. This is the first evidence of negative specific heats in that context. We also argue that saddle points of entropy can be long-lived and play a role in the dynamics because the system may not spontaneously generate the perturbations that destabilize them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据