4.3 Article

Induced orphaning reveals post-weaning maternal care in reindeer

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 589-596

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-012-0608-4

关键词

Feeding regime; Management induced orphaning; Post-weaning maternal care; Post-weaning maternal cost; Reindeer; Rangifer tarandus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A common by-product of human harvesting is orphaning of calves in autumn. Despite this, there are few studies in northern and temperate ungulates evaluating the fate of orphaned calves and the potential benefits to offspring and costs to mothers of post-weaning maternal care. We manipulated orphaning and forage distribution during winter for two herds of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus): one nonfed and the other supplementally fed to increase level of interference competition. Both herds consisted of females with and without calves at heel and orphaned calves. We measured survival and somatic losses during winter and distances between mother-calves and adult females-orphans within the herds. All females survived the winter, and there was no evidence of post-weaning maternal cost in terms of female's mass loss. The winter mortality among calves was negligible and did not differ between orphans as compared to nonorphans. However, nonorphaned calves lost less mass and stayed closer to their mothers than orphans to adult females, suggesting that increased mortality might occur in harsher winters. This tended to be more marked in the fed group where interference competition was more likely due to feed being concentrated both in space and time. Reduced mass loss in nonorphans is therefore most likely due to mothers sharing and defending feeding resources and protecting their offspring from harassment by other herd members during their first winter. We conclude that hunting practise of northern and temperate ungulates where females having calf/calves at heel are intentionally or non-intentionally harvested, may have demographic side effects at least in harsh winters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据