4.5 Article

Obesity and impaired venous function

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.01.006

关键词

obesity; varicose veins; physiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. The clinical severity of venous disease is often worse in obese patients. The objectives of this study were to compare lower limb venous physiology assessed by air plethysmography in a large group of obese and normal-weigh; patients; to consider the effect of posture on these measures and on foot vein pressure in a smaller cohort. Methods. Venous function was assessed using air plethysmography and duplex scanning in 934 consecutive patients, presenting for assessment of venous disease. These were grouped into obese or non-obese categories. A smaller group of twenty patients with a range of body weights were randomly selected from a database of patients with varicose veins. Foot vein pressures ana femoral vein diameter were measured standing, sitting, lying and ambulating. Results. Venous disease was more clinically severe in the obese limbs (CEAP C5&6 non-obese group 20.5%, obese group 35.4%, p < 0.001 chi(2)). Venous reflux was worse in the obese but measures Of muscle pump function were better. Residual volumes and fractions were better in the obese (mean residual volume, non-obese 60 SD 36, obese 50 SD 42, p < 0.001. t test). In the smaller study group weight correlated with the diameter of the superficial femoral vein (r = 0.50), ambulatont venous pressure (r = 0.45), venous filling index (r = 0.49) and the ejection volume (r = 0.38, p < 0.05). The foot venous pressure was significantly greater in the obese in all positions. Conclusion. The CEAP clinical stage of venous disease is more advanced in obese patients than non-obese patients with comparable anatomical patterns of venous incompetence. This may be the result of raised intra-abdominal pressure reported in previous studies, leading to greater reflux, increased vein diameter and venous pressures. (c) 2008 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据