4.5 Article

Fluid-fluid level in hepatic metastases: A characteristic sign of metastases of neuroendocrine origin

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 81, 期 9, 页码 2127-2132

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.012

关键词

Liver metastases; Neuroendocrine tumor; Magnetic resonance imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine MRI characteristics which indicate liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) rather than metastases of other origin (non-NET). Methods: Sixty-nine patients with histopathologically proven liver metastases from NET and 69 patients with known liver metastases of other origin underwent MRI of the liver using a 1.5 T MR-scanner. Two board certified radiologists assessed presence of fluid-fluid-levels, number and distribution pattern, signal intensity (SI) characteristics, lesion homogeneity, presence of central necrosis and intratumoral hemorrhage in T2w and T1w non-contrast imaging. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent association of image findings and occurrence of NET. Results: Fluid-fluid-levels were identified in 19/69 of patients with NET-metastases, and in none of the patients in the control group (p < 0.0001). Hyperintense SI in T1w imaging, markedly hyperintense SI in T2w imaging, a disseminated distribution pattern and intratumoral hemorrhage were indicative of NET metastases (p < 0.05). After statistical adjustment for all significant MRI findings, fluid-fluid-levels (OR: 17.6, 95% CI: 1.9-166.5), strongly hyperintense SI in T2w (OR: 4.7, 95% CI: 1.8-12.7) and a disseminated distribution pattern (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1-7.4) were independent predictors for NET metastases. Conclusions: The presence of fluid-fluid-levels is highly indicative of NET liver metastases and can be used as an independent predictor to distinguish them from metastases of other origin. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据