4.8 Article

(2+2) Cycloaddition of Benzyne to Endohedral Metallofullerenes M3N@C80 (M = Sc, Y): A Rotating-Intermediate Mechanism

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 137, 期 21, 页码 6820-6828

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b01444

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21171138, 20673081]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2012CB720904]
  3. National Science Foundation of the U.S.A. [CHE-1361104]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1361104] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Chemistry [1361104] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reaction mechanism and origin of regioselectivity of (2 + 2) cycloadditions of benzyne to endohedral metallofullerenes M3N@C-80 (M = Sc, Y) were investigated with density functional calculations. The reaction was demonstrated to follow a diradical mechanism rather than a carbene mechanism, in which the formation of the diradical intermediate is the rate-determining step. Through rotation of benzyne moiety on the fullerene surface, the diradical intermediate on 566 site could isomerize to two new diradical intermediates which give rise to two distinct [5,6] and [6,6] benzoadducts, respectively. However, the diradical intermediate on 666 site only produces the [6,6] benzoadduct. The nature of the endohedral cluster not only influences the regioselectivity, but also determines the cycloadduct geometry. For Sc3N@C-80, the [5,6] benzoadduct is preferred kinetically and thermodynamically, whereas in the case of Y3N@C-80, both [5,6] and [6,6] benzoadducts are favorable. In contrast to closed-cage benzoadducts of Sc3N@C-80, Y3N@C-80 affords open-cage benzoadducts, making it the first example that the endohedral cluster could alter cycloadducts from the closed cage to open cage. With further analysis, it is revealed that the origin of regioselectivity results from the local strain energy of the fullerene cage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据