4.7 Article

Differences in the characteristics of tolerance to μ-opioid receptor agonists in the colon from wild type and β-arrestin2 knockout mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 685, 期 1-3, 页码 133-140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.04.001

关键词

mu-Opioid receptor; beta-Arrestin2; Opioid; Circular smooth muscle; Tolerance

资金

  1. NIH [DA024009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drawbacks to opioid use include development of analgesic tolerance and persistent constipation. We previously reported that tolerance to morphine develops upon repeated exposure in the isolated ileum but not the isolated colon. The cellular mechanisms of antinociceptive tolerance vary among mu-opioid receptor agonists. In this study, we assess beta-arrestin2 deletion on the development of tolerance to different opioids in ileum and colon circular muscle. Tolerance was determined by assessing the ability of repeated in-vitro opioid exposure to induce contraction of the circular muscle from C57BL/6 wild type (WT) and beta-arrestin2 knockout (KO) mice. Repeated exposure every 30 min with in-between washes resulted in tolerance to all agonists in the ileum of both WT and KO mice. However, in the colon of WT mice, comparison of the contractions between the 4th exposure and 1st response was similar to DAMGO (100 +/- 10%; N = 5) but reduced to fentanyl (62 +/- 13%; N = 8) and etorphine (38 +/- 4%; N = 7) indicative of tolerance to fentanyl and etorphine but not DAMGO. In contrast, all agonists produced tolerance in the colon of KO: DAMGO response at the 4th exposure decreased to 52 +/- 10% (N = 5), fentanyl to 20 +/- 5% (N = 6) and etorphine 33 +/- 7% (N = 6). Differences in tolerance among opioid agonists in the colon suggest ligand bias. The deletion of beta-arrestin2 in colon appears to be necessary for tolerance to DAMGO but not fentanyl or etorphine. beta-arrestin2 potentially represents an important target for treating opioid-induced bowel dysfunction and warrants further exploration of its ligand bias. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据