4.7 Article

Improved formulation of photosensitizer chlorin e6 polyvinylpyrrolidone for fluorescence diagnostic imaging and photodynamic therapy of human cancer

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2008.02.013

关键词

chlorin e6; polyvinylpyrrolidone; photosensitizer; photodynamic therapy; fluorescence diagnosis; biodistribution; imaging; formulation

资金

  1. Singapore Millennium Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improved formulation of the photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) in combination with the hydrophilic polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) was investigated for its potential clinical applications in fluorescence diagnosis and photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer. This study reports the comparative preclinical biodistribution and efficacy of Ce6 delivered with or without PVP versus dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The safety and fluorescence pharrnacokinetics of Ce6-PVP in humans was also accessed. Biodistribution results showed that Ce6-PVP had higher tumor to normal tissue ratio compared to the other formulations. The sensitivity and specificity derived from the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves showed that the formulations were able to discriminate tumor from peritumoral muscle in the following order: Ce6-PVP > Ce6 > Ce6-DMSO. In vitro PDT results showed that Ce6-PVP was found to induce selective phototoxicity in leukemic cells compared to peripheral mononuclear blood cells. In addition, in vivo light irradiation at I h after Ce6-PVP was found to induce greater tumor necrosis without causing animal toxicity. In patients, preferential accumulation of Ce6-PVP was observed in angiosarcoma lesions compared to normal skin following intravenous administration. In conclusion, PVP significantly enhanced the Ce6 concentration ill tumors compared with Ce6 alone and increased the therapeutic index of PDT without any side effects in animal model. No serious adverse events were observed ill human as well. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据