4.4 Article

Heritability and lifestyle factors in chronic low back pain: Results of the Australian Twin Low Back Pain Study (The AUTBACK study)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 1410-1418

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.506

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNPq Brazilian foundation
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  3. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundHeritability and population-specific lifestyle factors are considered to significantly contribute to chronic low back pain (LBP), but traditional population studies fail to (1) adjust for genetics; and (2) use standard and validated definitions for LBP and for lifestyle factors. MethodsUsing a classical and a co-twin control study design and validated definitions for chronic LBP and lifestyle variables, we explored the relative contribution of genetics and environment on the prevalence of chronic LBP in a sample of adult Australian twins. ResultsData from 105 twin pairs showed that the prevalence of chronic LBP is significantly determined by genetic factors (heritability=32%). Additionally, monozygotic twins were five times more likely to have chronic LBP than dizygotic twins when one of the siblings of the pair was affected. In a case-control analysis (n=38 twin pairs), an exploratory analysis showed higher prevalence of chronic LBP associated with light walking exercises and vigorous gardening or heavy work around the house. Daily time spent in sitting was also positively associated with chronic LBP, but not moderate physical activities such as jogging, cycling and gentle swimming. In the final multivariate model, only time spent in vigorous gardening or heavy work around the house remained associated with chronic LBP (odds ratio 6.5; 95% confidence interval 1.47-28.8). ConclusionsThe type, frequency and duration of physical activity may be important to understand risk factors for chronic LBP. The causation path between chronic LBP and people's engagement in activities involving frequent bending and twisting such as gardening and housework should be further investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据