4.2 Article

Timing of external ventricular drainage and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 662-670

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.04.002

关键词

Intraventricular hemorrhage; Hydrocephalus; Early; Treatment; Cognitive function; Outcome

资金

  1. Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To delineate the impact of early (<= 25 days of life) versus late (>25 days) external ventricular drainage (EVD) on the neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) following intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Methods: We retrospectively categorized 32 premature infants with PHH into two groups according to whether they underwent early (n = 10) or late (n = 22) EVD. We administered the Battelle Developmental Inventory II and a neuromotor examination (median age, 73 months, range: 29-100). Results: In adjusted comparisons, early EVD was associated with better scores than late EVD in adaptive (79 +/- 22.6 vs. 58.8 +/- 8.1, P = .01), personal social (90.7 +/- 26 vs. 67.3 +/- 15.9, P = .02), communication (95.4 +/- 27.5 vs. 69.6 +/- 20.5, P = .04) and cognitive (78.9 +/- 24.4 vs. 60.7 +/- 11.5, P = .055) functions. Three (30%) early EVD infants had severe (<2.5 standard deviation) cognitive disability compared to 18 (82%) late EVD infants (P = .03). The incidences of cerebral palsy and neurosurgical complications were equal for the two groups. Subgroup analyses suggested that early EVD was beneficial in infants with original grade III IVH (n = 15, P < 0.05), but that it had no beneficial effects in infants with prior parenchymal injury (n = 17, P = NS). Conclusion: In this small retrospective series, early EVD is associated with lower rates of cognitive, communication and social disabilities than later EVD in infants with PHH without prior parenchymal injury. A randomized prospective trial is warranted. (C) 2012 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据