4.5 Article

Constitutive knockout of the membrane cytoskeleton protein beta adducin decreases mushroom spine density in the nucleus accumbens but does not prevent spine remodeling in response to cocaine

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 1-9

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12037

关键词

behavioral sensitisation; dendritic spines; DiI; diolistic labeling; medium spiny neurons; nucleus accumbens

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DA00436, DA14241, AA017922, AA010983]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adducin family of proteins associates with the actin cytoskeleton in a calcium-dependent manner. Beta adducin (beta Add) is involved in synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus; however, the role of beta Add in synaptic plasticity in other brain areas is unknown. Using diolistic labeling with the lipophilic dye DiI, we found that the density of mature mushroom-shaped spines was significantly decreased in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in brain slices from beta Add-knockout (KO) mice as compared to their wildtype (WT) siblings. The effect of 10 days of daily cocaine (15 mg/kg) administration on NAc spine number and locomotor behavior was also measured in beta Add WT and KO mice. As expected, there was a significant increase in overall spine density in NAc slices from cocaine-treated WT mice at this time-point; however, there was a greater increase in the density of mushroom spines in beta Add-KO animals following chronic cocaine administration than in WT. In addition, beta Add-KO mice showed elevated locomotor activity in response to cocaine treatment compared to WT siblings. These results indicate that beta Add is required for stabilising mature spines under basal conditions in the NAc, but that lack of this protein does not prevent synaptic remodeling following repeated cocaine administration. In addition, these data are consistent with previous studies suggesting that beta Add may normally be involved in stabilising spines once drug- or experience-dependent remodeling has occurred.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据