4.5 Article

Endogenous proBDNF is a negative regulator of migration of cerebellar granule cells in neonatal mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1376-1384

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07635.x

关键词

BrdU; neurite growth; neurotrophins; polarization; p75NTR

资金

  1. NHMRC [595937]
  2. Flinders University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The majority of newborn neurons migrate from their birthplace to final destination in the developing brain. Migration of cerebellar granule cells (CGCs) requires multiple factors. Mature brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) positively regulates the proliferation, migration, survival and differentiation of CGCs in rodents. However, the role of the BDNF precursor, proBDNF, in neuronal development remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the effect of proBDNF in vivo and in vitro on migration of CGCs. We demonstrate that proBDNF and its receptors p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) and sortilin are highly expressed in the cerebella as determined by immunohistochemistry and Western blot. ProBDNF is released from cultured cerebellar neurons, and this release is increased by high potassium stimulation. ProBDNF inhibits migration of CGCs in vitro, and the neutralizing antibodies to proBDNF enhance such migration as assayed by transwell culture. In addition, proBDNF incorporated into an agarose plug reduces granule cell migration from such plugs, whereas the neutralizing antibodies attract these cells towards the plug. The application of proBDNF into the lateral ventricle significantly inhibits migration of CGCs out of the proliferative zone into the internal granular cell layer, whereas the neutralizing antibodies enhance this migration. Furthermore, the effects of proBDNF on cell migration are lost in p75NTR-/- mice. Our data suggest that proBDNF negatively regulates migration of CGCs and this effect is mediated by p75NTR. We conclude that proBDNF has an opposing role in migration of CGCs to that of mature BDNF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据