4.5 Article

Light-evoked synaptic activity of retinal ganglion and amacrine cells is regulated in developing mouse retina

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 36-48

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07484.x

关键词

GABAergic; glutamatergic; light deprivation; patch-clamp recording; synaptic current

资金

  1. NIH [R01EY012345, P30 EY000785]
  2. Connecticut Lion
  3. Eye Research Foundation
  4. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [P30EY000785, R01EY012345, P30EY014800] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown a continued maturation of visual responsiveness and synaptic activity of retina after eye opening, including the size of receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), light-evoked synaptic output of RGCs, bipolar cell spontaneous synaptic inputs to RGCs, and the synaptic connections between RGCs and ON and OFF bipolar cells. Light deprivation retarded some of these age-dependent changes. However, many other functional and morphological features of RGCs are not sensitive to visual experience. To determine whether light-evoked synaptic responses of RGCs undergo developmental change, we directly examined the light-evoked synaptic inputs from ON and OFF synaptic pathways to RGCs in developing retinas, and found that both light-evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic currents decreased, but not increased, with age. We also examined the light-evoked synaptic inputs from ON and OFF synaptic pathways to amacrine cells in developing retinas and found that the light-evoked synaptic input of amacrine cells is also downregulated in developing mouse retina. Different from the developmental changes of RGC spontaneous synaptic activity, dark rearing has little effect on the developmental changes of light-evoked synaptic activity of both RGCs and amacrine cells. Therefore, we concluded that the synaptic mechanisms mediating spontaneous and light-evoked synaptic activity of RGCs and amacrine cells are likely to be different.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据