4.5 Article

Light regulation of retinal dopamine that is independent of melanopsin phototransduction

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 761-767

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06631.x

关键词

amacrine cells; dopamine; melanopsin; mice; retina; tyrosine hydroxylase

资金

  1. BBSRC
  2. British Pharmacological Society Integrative Pharmacology Fund
  3. The London Project to Cure Blindness
  4. NIH [R01 EY004864, R01 EY014764, P30 EY06360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light-dependent release of dopamine (DA) in the retina is an important component of light-adaptation mechanisms. Melanopsin-containing inner retinal photoreceptors have been shown to make physical contacts with DA amacrine cells, and have been implicated in the regulation of the local retinal environment in both physiological and anatomical studies. Here we determined whether they contribute to photic regulation of DA in the retina as assayed by the ratio of DA with its primary metabolite, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), and by c-fos induction in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-labelled DA amacrine cells. Light treatment (similar to 0.7 log W/m(2) for 90 min) resulted in a substantial increase in DA release (as revealed by an increase in the DOPAC : DA ratio), as well as widespread induction of nuclear c-fos in DA amacrine cells in wild-type mice and in mice lacking melanopsin (Opn4(-/-)). Light-induced DA release was also retained in mice lacking rod phototransduction (Gnat1(-/-)), although the magnitude of this response was substantially reduced compared with wild-types, as was the incidence of light-dependent nuclear c-fos in DAergic amacrines. By contrast, the DAergic system of mice lacking both rods and cones (rd/rd cl) showed no detectable light response. Our data suggest that light regulation of DA, a pivotal retinal neuromodulator, originates primarily with rods and cones, and that melanopsin is neither necessary nor sufficient for this photoresponse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据