4.5 Article

Activation of dopamine D1-like receptors in nucleus accumbens is critical for the acquisition, but not the expression, of nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences in rats

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1525-1533

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06127.x

关键词

carbohydrate; conditioning; core; SCH23390; shell

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK071761, DK071761] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study investigated the role of dopamine neurotransmission within the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in flavor preference learning induced by the postoral consequences of carbohydrates. In Experiment 1, rats fitted with a gastric catheter were trained with a flavor (CS+) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of 8% glucose and a different flavor (CS-) paired with IG water infusions. The CS+ preference was then evaluated in two-bottle preference tests following bilateral injection of the dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH23390 into the NAc shell at total doses of 0, 12, 24 and 48 nmol. SCH23390 produced dose-related reductions in CS+ intake but did not block the CS+ preference except at the highest dose, which also greatly suppressed the CS intakes. In Experiment 2, new rats were injected daily in the NAc shell with either saline or SCH23390 (12 nmol), 10 min prior to training sessions with CS+ with IG glucose and CS- with IG water. In the two-bottle preference tests, the drug-treated rats, unlike the control rats, did not significantly prefer the CS+ (61 vs. 83% preference). In Experiment 3, new rats were trained with the same procedures as Experiment 2, except that brain injections were in the NAc core. In contrast to control rats, SCH-treated rats failed to prefer the CS+ to the CS- in two-bottle tests (55% vs. 89% preference). These results demonstrate that D1-like receptors in the NAc shell and core are greatly involved in the acquisition, but less so in the expression, of a flavor preference conditioned by postingestive effects of glucose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据