4.7 Article

In-vitro anti-proliferative and anti-oxidant activity of galangin, fisetin and quercetin: Role of localization and intermolecular interaction in model membrane

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 102-109

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.04.002

关键词

Flavonols; Dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl choline; Differential scanning calorimetry; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Ring current shifts; Chemical shift anisotropy

资金

  1. Indian National Science Academy
  2. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flavonols are an important class of naturally occurring molecules and are known for their pharmacological activity. The activity is associated with the ability of flavonols to influence membrane-dependent processes. We have investigated the in-vitro anti-proliferative and anti-oxidant activity of galangin (GLN), fisetin (FTN) and quercetin (QTN), which possess variable number of phenolic hydroxyl groups. An attempt has been made to correlate the biological activity of these molecules with their interaction and localization in dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl choline (DPPC) bilayers, using differential dcanning calorimetty (DSC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods. Results indicate that GLN interacts to the alkyl chains of the lipid bilayer involving hydrophobic interactions. FIN and QTN interact with head region and sn-1-glycero region involving hydrogen bonding. Ring current induced chemical shifts of lipid protons, due to intermolecular interaction indicate that GLN acquires a parallel orientation with respect to the bilayer normal whereas FTN and QTN resume a mixed orientation. The membrane binding constants of these molecules are in the order GLN > QTN > FIN. It has been shown that the number and position of hydroxyl groups in these molecules play an important role in membrane binding and thereby in biological activity. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据