4.7 Article

Probing the aurone scaffold against Plasmodium falciparum: Design, synthesis and antimalarial activity

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 523-534

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.04.076

关键词

Malaria; Plasmodium falciparum; Aurones; Cross-coupling reactions

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [PTDC/SAU-FAR/118459/2010, Pest-OE/SAL/UI4013/2011]
  2. FCT [SFRH/BD/41276/2007, SFRH/BD/61611/2009]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/61611/2009, SFRH/BD/41276/2007, PTDC/SAU-FAR/118459/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A library comprising 44 diversely substituted aurones derivatives was synthesized by straightforward aldol condensation reactions of benzofuranones and the appropriately substituted benzaldehydes. Microwave enhanced synthesis using palladium catalyzed protocols was introduced as a powerful strategy for extending the chemical space around the aurone scaffold. Additionally, Mannich-base derivatives, containing a 7-aminomethyl-6-hydroxy substitution pattern at ring A, were also prepared. Screening against the chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum W2 strain identified novel aurones with 1050 values in the low micromolar range. The most potent compounds contained a basic moiety, with the ability to accumulate in acidic digestive vacuole of the malaria parasite. However, none of those aurones revealed significant activity against hemozoin formation and falcipain-2, two validated targets expressed during the blood stage of P. falciparum infection and functional in digestive vacuole of the parasite. Overall, this study highlight (i) the usefulness of aurones as platforms for synthetic procedures using palladium catalyzed protocols to rapidly deliver lead compounds for further optimization and (ii) the potential of novel aurone derivatives as promising antimalarial compounds. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据