4.6 Article

Systolic and diastolic function in patients with systemic sclerosis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 378-382

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.10.011

关键词

Systemic sclerosis; Tissue Doppler; Cardiac function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Clinical and epidemiological findings indicate that symptomatic heart disease in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) predicts poor prognosis, but cardiac involvement may occur years before clinical manifestation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cardiac function in patients with SSc and to correlate the echocardiographic parameters with others that quantify the diseases' severity. Methods: Twenty consecutive patients with SSc were investigated with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Two dimensional, pulsed Doppler and pulsed tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) techniques were used, in all the patients, to assess the systolic and diastolic function for left ventricle (LV). Correlations were made between echocardiographic measurements and some clinical and serological features of the patients. Results: None of the patients had any clinical signs of cardiac involvement, nor ECG or TTE systolic function impairment; there are significant differences between systemic sclerosis patients and control group for peak A velocity (0.75 +/- 0.22 vs 0.57 +/- 0.32, P=0.05), E/A ratio (1.14 +/- 0.22 vs 1.48 +/- 0.26, P=0.01), E/Ea ratio (8.25 +/- 1.57 vs 7 +/- 2.2, P=0.05), which account for filling impairment of LV. There are also significant correlations between some other parameters, like the mean duration of Raynaud's phenomenon and E/Ea ratio (r=0.48, P<0.05). Conclusions: The analysis of SSc heart disease, mainly at a preclinical level, is important in all the cases as an asymptomatic patient may have diastolic dysfunction which can be treated and should be closely observed. (C) 2008 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据