4.5 Article

Hybrid Architectures from 3D Aligned Arrays of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes and Nanoparticulate LiCoPO4: Synthesis, Properties and Evaluation of Their Electrochemical Performance as Cathode Materials in Lithium Ion Batteries

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 28, 页码 4349-4359

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201100217

关键词

Hybrid materials; Lithium-ion batteries; Electrochemistry; Nanotubes; Nanoparticles; Phosphoolevins

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SPP 1181, JA859/14, SCHN375/16, EH183/3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid materials composed of LiMPO4 (M = Fe or Co) with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MCNTs) were synthesized by tethering lithium phosphoolevins on isolated stochastically disordered MWCNTs as well as on ordered 3D MWCNT arrays via solution based impregnation routes. Ordered 3D arrays of MWCNT monoliths comprising MWCNTs with nominal tube diameters of 60 and 200 nm were synthesized by a catalyst free, template based method, with porous aluminum oxide (PAOX) acting as a template. Consecutive selective etching processes gave free standing aligned 3D carbon nanotube (CNT) architectures that were used as supporting cathode structures for electroactive LiCoPO4. LiCoPO4 nanoparticle suspensions derived from an ethanol based organic phosphate source turned out to be superior for the tethering of LiCoPO4 nanoparticles onto the 3D aligned CNT arrays compared to an aqueous based tethering route, thus giving hybrid materials with better electrochemical battery performance compared to materials generated by the latter method. Li ion extraction within the ordered 3D CNT/LiCoPO4 composites seems to be a two-step process and the Li intercalation a one-step process, highlighting the enhanced kinetics of the Li insertion process in the 3D CNT/LixCoPO4 composite in comparison to a particulate mixture of LixCoPO4 that is typically present in a conventional carbon/LiCoPO4 cathode composite system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据