4.5 Article

Inefficient antimicrobial functions of innate phagocytes render infant mice more susceptible to bacterial infection

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 1322-1332

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201243077

关键词

Antimicrobial functions; Infant innate immunity; Phagocytes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272143]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [K200509]
  3. Jiangsu Innovation Team [LJ201141]
  4. Jiangsu Province Program of Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talents
  5. Science Foundation Ireland Research Frontiers Programme [SFI/08/RFP/BIC1734]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonates and infants, due to the immaturity in their adaptive immunity, are thought to depend largely on the innate immune system for protection against bacterial infection. However, the innate immunity-mediated antimicrobial response in neonates and infants is incompletely characterized. Here, we report that infant mice were more susceptible to microbial sepsis than adult mice, with significantly reduced bacterial clearance from the circulation and visceral organs. Infant PMNs exhibited less constitutive expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR2, and bacterial infection caused further reduction of PMN CXCR2 in infant mice compared with adult mice. This correlates with diminished in vitro chemotaxis of infant PMNs toward the chemoattractant CXCL2 and impaired in vivo recruitment of infant PMNs into the infectious site. Furthermore, consistent with the reduced antimicrobial response in vivo, infant macrophages displayed an impaired bactericidal activity with a defect in phagosome maturation after ingestion of either gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria. Thus, infant mice exhibit an increased vulnerability to microbial infection with delayed bacterial clearance, which is associated with the inefficiency in their innate phagocyte-associated antimicrobial functions characterized by defects in PMN recruitment and macrophage phagosome maturation during microbial sepsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据