4.5 Article

Modified vaccinia Ankara-expressing Ag85A, a novel tuberculosis vaccine, is safe in adolescents and children, and induces polyfunctional CD4(+) T cells

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 279-290

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/eji.200939754

关键词

IL-17; Modified vaccinia Ankara-expressing Ag85A; Polyfunctional; Tuberculosis; Vaccine

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [081122/Z/06/Z, 080929/Z/06/Z]
  2. Europe AID [SANTE/2006/105-066]
  3. NIH [RO1-AI065653, NO1-AI70022]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI065653] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modified vaccinia Ankara-expressing Ag85A (MVA85A) is a new tuberculosis (TB) vaccine aimed at enhancing immunity induced by BCG. We investigated the safety and immunogenicity of MVA85A in healthy adolescents and children from a TB endemic region, who received BCG at birth. Twelve adolescents and 24 children were vaccinated and followed up for 12 or 6 months, respectively. Adverse events were documented and vaccine-induced immune responses assessed by IFN-gamma ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining. The vaccine was well tolerated and there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events. MVA85A induced potent and durable T-cell responses. Multiple CD4(+) T-cell subsets, based on expression of IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-2, IL-17 and GM-CSF, were induced. Polyfunctional CD4(+) T cells co-expressing IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and IL-2 dominated the response in both age groups. A novel CD4(+) cell subset co-expressing these three Th1 cytokines and IL-17 was induced in adolescents, while a novel CD4(+) T-cell subset co-expressing Th1 cytokines and GM-CSF was induced in children. Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells were not detected. We conclude that in adolescents and children MVA85A safely induces the type of immunity thought to be important in protection against TB. This includes induction of novel Th1-cell populations that have not been previously described in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据