4.5 Article

Associations of apolipoprotein E gene with ischemic stroke and intracranial atherosclerosis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 955-960

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.27

关键词

APOE gene; ischemic stroke; intracranial atherosclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon 4 allele is associated with elevated cholesterol and risk of atherosclerosis. However, its role in ischemic stroke (IS) remains controversial. We investigated a possible link between IS or the severity of intracranial atherosclerosis and the APOE promoter polymorphisms -219G/T and +113G/C, involved in regulating APOE transcription. We genotyped subjects from a multicentric Belgian case-control study, including 237 middle-aged patients with IS due to small- or large-vessel atherosclerotic stroke and 326 ethnicity- and gender-matched controls and a Finnish autopsy series of 1004 non-stroke cases, who had received a quantitative score of atherosclerosis in the circle of Willis. The APOE epsilon 4+ genotype did not associate with IS, but was related to more severe intracranial atherosclerosis score in men (5.4 vs 4.6, P = 0.044). Within the most common APOE epsilon 3/epsilon 3 genotype group, the risk of IS associated with the G-allele of the tightly linked -219G/T (OR 6.2; 95% CI: 1.6-24.3, P = 0.009) and +113G/C (OR = 7.1; 95% CI: 1.7-29.9, P = 0.007) promoter polymorphisms. There was no difference in the severity of intracranial atherosclerosis between -219G/G genotype carriers and non-carriers. This study suggests a multifaceted role of apoE on the risk of cerebrovascular diseases. The APOE epsilon 4+ genotype did not predict the risk of IS but was associated with severity of subclinical intracranial atherosclerosis in men on the autopsy study. In contrast, the promoter variants were significant predictors of IS, suggesting that quantitative rather than qualitative variation of apoE is related to IS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据