4.3 Article

Rifaximin in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: hit multiple targets with a single shot

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001232

关键词

bacterial endotoxin; gut microbiota; insulin resistance; lipopolysaccharides; rifaximin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/AimsThe pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may include increased insulin resistance, upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines, lipopolysaccharide, and BMI. Rifaximin is a minimally absorbable antibiotic that might act against a broad spectrum of gut bacteria. This study aimed to investigate the effects of rifaximin on NAFLD.Patients and methodsFifty participants with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) were registered in this multicentric, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. BMI, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, -glutamyl transferase, lipid profile, serum endotoxin, homeostatic model assessment, toll-like receptor-4, interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-, and cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) levels were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months of rifaximin therapy (1100mg/day).ResultsPatients were randomized into two groups (rifaximin group; n=25 and placebo group; n=25). After 6 months of rifaximin therapy, patients with NASH showed a significant reduction in homeostatic model assessment, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, -glutamyl transferase, endotoxin, toll-like receptor-4, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-, CK-18, and NAFLD-liver fat score (all P<0.05), but no changes in the lipid profile; moreover, there was a mild nonstatistically significant reduction of BMI. However, in the placebo group, there was no significant difference in these variables at baseline and after therapy.ConclusionRifaximin therapy appears to be effective and safe in modifying NASH through reduction of serum endotoxin and improvement of insulin resistance, proinflammatory cytokines, CK-18, and NAFLD-liver fat score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据