4.6 Article

A direct comparison of quality of life in obese and Cushing's syndrome patients

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 168, 期 5, 页码 787-793

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-12-1078

关键词

-

资金

  1. intramural program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Obese (OB) individuals and patients with Cushing's syndrome (CS) often have similar clinical presentations. While each group has reduced health-related quality of life (HRQL), it is not known whether the degree of impairment is different and might distinguish between them. The objective of this study was to compare HRQL in these two populations. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Three hundred and twenty-seven OB patients (48.1 +/- 11.7 years; 72.5% women) with weight gain and at least two features of CS were recruited from an outpatient weight management clinic. Sixty-six untreated patients with CS (41.6 +/- 13.2 years; 78.8% women) presented to the NIH Clinical Center for evaluation. Subjects completed the SF-36 survey and a locally created symptom questionnaire. Results: After adjusting for symptom count, OB patients had a significantly higher (better HRQL) mean physical component summary (PCS) score than CS patients (44.9 +/- 0.6 vs 35.4 +/- 1.5, P<0.0001). However, the mean mental component summary (MCS) score was lower (worse HRQL) in the OB group (41.6 +/- 0.6 vs 50.7 +/- 1.6, P<0.0001). Symptom count showed significant correlations with PCS and MCS scores. BMI correlated with PCS (r=-0.29) in OB but not in CS patients. BMI was not associated with MCS in either group. Conclusion: HRQL is significantly different between OB and CS patients. Surprisingly, after adjusting for symptom count, OB patients showed worse mental health scores than the CS population. Significant differences in HRQL and symptom count may suggest which OB patients should be screened for CS. European Journal of Endocrinology 168 787-793

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据