4.3 Article

A candidate gene study of serotonergic pathway genes and pain relief during treatment with escitalopram in patients with neuropathic pain shows significant association to serotonin receptor2C (HTR2C)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 67, 期 11, 页码 1131-1137

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-1056-x

关键词

Pharmacogenetics; Neuropathic pain; SSRI treatment; Treatment response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Previous studies have shown that a small fraction of patients with peripheral neuropathic pain experiences >50% pain relief during treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), whereas most patients have no or only slight relief. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between polymorphisms in genes involved in the serotonergic pathway and the effect of escitalopram on peripheral neuropathic pain. Methods We genotyped 34 participants from a placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram in peripheral neuropathic pain for polymorphisms in five genes: the serotonin receptor 2A (HTR2A) gene, the serotonin receptor 2C (HTR2C) gene, the ABCB1 gene encoding for the P-glycoprotein, the CYP2C19 gene, and the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4). Results The SNP rs6318 (Cys23Ser) in the HTR2C gene showed significant association with treatment response in men (p=0.047), with 75% carrying the C allele being responders. The same tendency was seen in women. Similarly, carriership of the C allele at rs6318 was associated with better pain relief during treatment with escitalopram [odds ratio (OR) 15.5, p=0.014)] Furthermore, there was a tendency of better relief with increasing number of short alleles for the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism of the serotonin transporter (OR 5.7, p=0.057). None of the other polymorphisms showed a significant association with treatment response to escitalopram. Conclusion This study indicates that variation in the HTR2C gene is associated to the pain-relieving effect of escitalopram in patients with painful polyneuropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据