4.5 Article

Preoperative exclusive enteral nutrition reduces the postoperative septic complications of fistulizing Crohn's disease

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 68, 期 4, 页码 441-446

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.16

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Talents of Jiangsu Province, China [BRA2011232]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270478]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) has been shown to be effective in the management of Crohn's disease (CD). However, few experiences have been reported regarding its role in postoperative intra-abdominal septic complications (IASCs) after bowel resections for enterocutaneous fistulas (ECFs). Our aim was to investigate the influence of preoperative 3-month EEN on the incidence of IASCs and to clarify the risk factors of IASCs in fistulizing CD. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A retrospective study on 123 CD patients suffering from ECFs was conducted from February 2001 to April 2011. Fifty-five patients (44.7%) received preoperative 3-month EEN. The changes in serum albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared. Perioperative data were analyzed using logistic regression to identify the independent risk factors affecting the incidence of postoperative IASCs. RESULTS: Patients were similar in gender, age, fistula conditions and perioperative medications in the EEN and non-EEN groups. The EEN group had a significantly higher serum albumin level and lower CRP at operation, and suffered a lower risk of IASCs (3.6% vs 17.6%, P<0.05). Two years after operation when follow-up ended, the two groups had comparable cumulative risk of IASCs (P=0.109). A logistic regression analysis identified age at operation and preoperative EEN as independent risk factors of postoperative IASCs. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative EEN reduced the risk of postoperative IASCs after operation for ECFs in CD. In addition, age at operation may be another factor of influence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据